Back to the case
Proposed · public vote pending ·City of Bend ·Applies to City of Bend ·Last checked 2026-06-03

Bend: the law comes first.

SB 1516 makes a published, compliant policy a prerequisite to deploying ALPR or signing an ALPR contract — not a box to check afterward. Bend’s existing policy does not comply and no compliant version is posted. The City should fix the policy in public, weigh the trade-off openly, and only then decide on any expenditure — in that order, because the law requires that order.

Short version

In January 2026 the Council unanimously switched off four fixed Flock cameras — not over a technicality, but because the city had collected a database of who drove where and couldn’t control who reached it. Now the City is considering bringing fixed readers back through Axon — a proposal that nearly advanced on the city manager’s $250K-per-increment authority, with no Council vote. Oregon law now sets the sequence, and Bend is out of sequence.

· The evidence

Bend Council voted unanimously (Jan 7–8 2026) to turn off and remove four Flock cameras and not renew.

✓ Local reporting

The Axon ALPR add-on was positioned to advance via the city manager’s $250K-per-increment authority, without a Council vote.

✓ Local reporting

SB 1516 §7(1): an agency must publish a compliant ALPR policy before deploying or using ALPR.

✓ Official record

SB 1516 §8(1): no agency may extend, renew, or enter a new ALPR vendor contract unless the agency and the contract comply.

✓ Official record

SB 1516 §4(3)(a): 30-day maximum retention for non-case data — a ceiling, not a floor.

✓ Official record

Bend Policy 428 (rev. Nov 2023) lacks the retention cap, the vendor end-to-end-encryption term, and the out-of-state-sharing limit; no compliant version is posted as of June 3 2026 (the police-policies page 404s).

✓ Official record

City Manager’s Report (May 1 2026): BPD wants to reinstall ALPR via Axon, evaluate two demo units, with a ~$19K grant.

✓ Official record

~70 BPD cruisers already run Axon Fleet 3 in-car ALPR (since July 2023) — the stolen-vehicle use is already covered without blanketing the city’s entrances with fixed cameras.

✓ Local reporting

A Vallejo, California randomized trial found 35–37% of fixed-ALPR "hits" were misreads.

✓ Analysis

ALPR errors have ended with innocent people at gunpoint: a Colorado family including a six-year-old forced face-down ($1.9M settlement); a San Francisco woman held over a single misread digit ($495K).

✓ Analysis

The Institute for Justice documented at least 18 cases of officers using plate readers to stalk partners or family.

✓ Analysis

Even at the 30-day retention ceiling, chokepoint cameras log enough ordinary trips — to clinics, houses of worship, union halls, protests — to reconstruct a person’s life.

What officials should answer

Do not approve or fund any new or expanded ALPR deployment, and do not sign or amend any ALPR contract, until:

  1. 01A public, SB 1516-compliant Policy 428 is published and independently reviewed.
  2. 02The full cost, retention, data-sharing, and encryption-key / data-controller terms are public.
  3. 03The City Council votes in public after a real comment period — keeping the Mayor’s commitment to a public vote. Fix the policy first; the law requires it.
· The ask

The contract passed — but ALPR isn’t activated. There’s still time to be heard.

The Bend ALPR expansion is still only proposed, and the County hasn’t switched plate-reading on. A short, sourced email to the Bend Council and the County Commissioners is the single highest-leverage action you can take this week.